
Those of you who have been around for a while may remember The Last Viner Standing - a competition I held in April of 2007.
The rules were simple: that month, anyone who wanted to participate was to publish a single original article per day to Newsvine. If you miss a day, you're out. The Last Viner Standing wins. There are no prizes beyond the visibility and motivation provided by the contest.
This time around, I want to make it a bit more interesting - but I'm not 100% sure how. I may choose weekly themes? I may open this up to community elimination? I may ask celebrity judges cruelly dismiss a participant for low quality? The options are limitless, and you and I have until September First to figure them out.
Here are the initial rules:
Now then, who is interested?
Also, if you have any ideas for additional rules to make this more interesting, please post them below.
Very interesting. I don't think I made it very far last time, but it was an interesting experiment.
I do like the idea of having some kind of panel of cruel judges (with one sappy, sentimental one who routinely gets voted down) on the lookout for quality, and booting contestants who post crap. Or something along those lines.
It was fun for the five days I participated last time. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't even make it that far this go around, so I'm probably not in this time.
I think themes would be helpful or more of a challenge if you will.
But I may not be able to do this because I won't have computer access for a weekend. Otherwise I'd love to. I'll have to check on flight times and whether we're permitted mulligans. Hehe.
I'll happily watch from the peanut gallery, but I doubt I'd get far in that.....why can't days have 30 hours or something? Never enough time!
I'd love to go again but not with these rules. Bare minimum:
1. The contest doesn't end until there actually is one last person standing. Otherwise it's not a last person standing contest.
2. No poetry, no song lyrics, no fiction, no interviews. (Sorry Scott, but interviews are transcription, not writing.)
3. 400 words minimum.
4. No mulligans.
5. Daily deadline is fixed at xx:00 GMT for consistency; TBD.
6. Someone dedicated to creating and updating the tracking spreadsheet. The last one was constantly out of date.
Everyone who did this last time really enjoyed it, ...
It was fun right up until my laptop was destroyed because of the contest. :(
I could get behind those rules, Paul. Granted, it's doubtful I'd remain standing after a few days, but I'd be willing to give it a shot.
Sorry, but I think fiction should be included. There are a bunch of damn good fiction writers on Newsvine. And as long as a minimum word count is put in place (which I agree, there should be one) then there's still a challenge.
Original poetry is not writing? Thats harsh!
Look, friends, I'm a fiction writer and a fiction writing teacher, for god's sake. But for Newsvine purposes, and for the purposes of a contest such as the one proposed here, I do believe that fiction should be set by the wayside.
If only because judging fiction against non-fiction is next to impossible, most especially in light of the time constraints put in place by a contest of this nature.
Original poetry is not writing? Thats harsh!
It wouldn't meet the minimum word count anyway, and that is one thing that has to get in this time. There were people sticking in near the end posting 1-3 sentences while others were putting out 1500 words or more. My best was "No Iraq Plan" at 1972 words, while the worst was "Are webisodes killing reruns" at 461. I averaged 983 words over the month for a total of 27,546.
I think it's good that the requirements be set high enough that it will eliminate people, it is a contest after all.
Are you trying to tell me a poet can't meet a word count? Have you ever heard of epic? Not that I could ever come up with an epic. You're talking word count and any poet worth his balls or her ovaries can meet a word count.
You know I'm in. Remind how it ended last time - a tie between me and others?
. (Sorry Scott, but interviews are transcription, not writing.)
I'm ok with your rules.
I'd argue fiction should be included but I can go either way on that.
But please tell me satire is allowed so I and others can at least be creative in commenting on current events.
Given in on the east coast of Aust Id have trouble with timing deadline...
trouble with timing deadline
even if it was weekly?
no weekly is ok...
Hmmm.... life or newsvine? *grin*
Sorry Myk.
Good luck to all who will participate. I'm out (can't manage an article a day). I'll keep watch on this event though.
Between my fiction writing and school, I'm not sure if I'd get that far--but, I'm more than willing to give it a shot. :D
This isn't necessarily going to engage new users (or old, judging from these first few responses) and we really want to be encouraging quality over quantity, anyway, so why not reduce the article requirement to one per week and rotate between the various news categories we have (world, local, tech, etc)? This way, everyone has time to produce a quality product and will instead be challenged with topics, time, boredom, etc.
If it lasts for a really long time, so what?
Great points, Ben.
I am so down with one per week. Quality.
I am so down with one per week. Quality.
I prefer it twice weekly or weakly to daily. And I think it will force a focus on quality over quantity.
Of course I already write at least one article per week so maybe I should offer to be a judge instead of a participant. I have the advantage of having to write one or two articles a day for 10 years so one a week is pretty easy.
Scott, that's why you'd require topics.
It's possible for us to tailor challenges to each participant. If there was an interview week, I'd probably want you to do at least three per week, while I'd expect only one from others. I think this is preferential anyway because we would want to assign different categories to different people so that we don't have 20 people writing arts articles in the same week.
Ah,last time we didn't have topics. Maybe we can have backwards or opposites week (where we'd have to write the opposite of what we think on a topic chosen by a judge - sort of like one viner did last year)
and one week topics could be randomly chosen
That would make it more interesting and challenging. Myk, let me know if you want me to participate or help as an advisor or judge. I'm at your disposal on this one.
Oh plus I'm going to be offline and computerless (now THAT will be a tougher challenge than this) for one week as I go to Jamaica for "work" in mid-September.
What if you made a list of types of articles and writers had to choose one of the types for their weekly story? It would work like a literary to-do list.
For example, if the categories were:
world news
US news
state/local news
opinion
fiction
book review
movie review
poetry
etc...
Each week participants could choose a type and then mark that type off. They would specify via tags or in the title which category that week's article represented. That would encourage everyone to get out of their comfort zone at least once throughout the competition and write something the might not necessarily do.
I thought about that too and failed to mention, so it must be gold.
Sorry, I'd rather see a suggestion of something to write about that does not require that I read a book, go to a movie. I work 65 hours a week. I can't be going to movies or traipsing over to the library so I'll have something to write about.
Give me a theme, topic, and I'll write, but I can't be running all over town and taking up time I don't have in preparation for writing something for this contest. The writing itself should be enough.
Sorry, I'd rather see a suggestion of something to write about that does not require that I read a book, go to a movie. I work 65 hours a week. I can't be going to movies or traipsing over to the library so I'll have something to write about.
Those were just examples, and even so, I reckon you could review a movie you've already seen or a book you've already read. "my favorite movie, by jlp coos" or "the worst book ever, by jlp coos".
Anyway, it was just a suggestion to give some variety.
Amazing SDJ: Thanks for clarification.
If I had more time, I'd love to participate in the things you suggested. I just don't have much time right now.
Thanks for being a sweetie. I over-reacted a bit--probably from being tired and I got a huge blister on the bottom of my foot last night. I worked 10.5 hours at the restaurant with no sit-down time the entire time. The lift in my right shoe kept sliding forward and hitting the wrong part of my foot, and caused a huge nasty blister. Ouch.
Have a good day.
Oh plus I'm going to be offline and computerless (now THAT will be a tougher challenge than this) for one week as I go to Jamaica for "work" in mid-September.
I hope that annual leave pass from Newsvine has been granted ?
hope that annual leave pass from Newsvine has been granted ?
Uh oh. I need permission? I just wonder how far I'll drop on the leaderboard.
Maybe if something is judged to be of *very* high quality (original reporting, linked to by major sites, etc.) then the author gets a day (or more) off from the posting obligation. That way, you can be steady or you can work on fewer articles of very high quality. ??
I'd lay out some clear requirements defining what's considered very high quality, as well as high quality, average and trash, before going ahead but this is good.
Very high quality would get two days off. High, one day. Normal, stick Myk's schedule below. Trash, disqualified.
As far as the requirements defining *very* high quality, it'd be nice if an original photograph was one of them, though not necessarily by the author but someone from Newsvine.
Ben J: Clear requirements are a good idea. I certainly agree with you on that. Some of the spelling in the vines is atrocious. Will spelling and grammar be part of the judging as well as content, style, and overall value? I, too, would like to know criteria for excellence.
All of us are going to have good and bad days with this. It's just the nature of writing all the time. Not many of us are going to have trash, because those of us interested in this challenge are already interested in writing well. I'm not sure disqualification from the contest for one bad day occasionally throughout the challenge is fair. Or did you mean trash articles be disqualified for just that one day?
This is a WRITING contest, not photography. I don't have a printer/scanner and won't be able to afford one for a long time yet. I can supply my own cartoons, but haven't figured out how to do that yet. My and your WRITING is all that should matter in this contest. This is not a multimedia exercise.
As far as I'm concerned anyone who writes trash should be disqualified from the contest, period. But perhaps there could be a point tallying system or if you have three disqualified articles, you're out of the contest.
Also, I think an article of VERY high quality should contain an original photograph.
There must be some place for displaying great photos here on the vine. I would like to see it, even though I can't contribute.
Sorry I have to disagree with you on this, Ben. Please take no offense. It's not personal.
To purchase a camera for this contest would cost $100 to $500. The other equipment would cost more.
This is a WRITING contest. All of us are capable of writing. Social and economic factors play into whether or not we can include an original photograph and therefore should not be part of the contest. Just my 2 cents.
I agree that it's premature/inappropriate for this contest. Can't blame a guy for trying to merge the two things together, right?
... In regards to the photo contest, I, unless someone beats me to it, will probably will start some sort of contest.
I'll be sure to look for your photos, Ben. I bet I'll enjoy them.
Thanks for understanding.
Myk:
Rule change? Keep everything like you have it but make it twice a week instead of daily. I still probably would be incapable of competing, but you'd strike a better quality/quantity balance.
I second the motion of the gentleman from Massachusetts.
Motion carried ? Yes ?
I'm not against this, but I may have to adjust the requirements corresponding to the prizes if Myk decides to change this.
So, is fiction allowed, or not?
I write what pops into my head at the end of the day.
I want to participate whether or not fiction is allowed. Just let me know.
This should be great fun!
Specify a topic. Damn. That implies impartial topic assignment.
I dont why poets can't compete in this.
Some sort of you're not good enough. Name the topic. Set a word count.
Game.
@ #15
Like it.
I believe I won the last one and will likely do so again.
I think your memory is incorrect. I think it ended in a tie here
Myk, how many days did the last Last Viner Standing last? (enough 'last's?)
I think it was one month. 30 days, including weekends.
And some of us could have held out at least another month.
I think it was one month. 30 days, including weekends.
And some of us could have held out at least another month.
Well, in that case - why don't we up the ante?
Winner of the contest who lasts the following number of days gets the corresponding prize:
There can only be one winner (no tie), and all participants and their entries are subject to the rules Myk and Co. put forth as well as the judges' rulings. I also believe y'all should hold yourselves to pretty high standards in terms of quality, so that this doesn't become a 'who can post daily fluff longest' match.
Lastly, the recipient of the prize will have to fill out some basic legalese paperwork to make it kosher with the IRS, etc. And, I *think* our lawyers will tell us that we're only allowed to give the prize to someone residing in the US.
Well, what do you think?
Calvin, Calvin, Calvin, how can you offer prizes for this hear event while forsaking the now third annual newsvine fantasy football league (of which you showed up late for the draft!)? ;-)
Who are going to be the judges? Can bias be avoided in something like this if say favorite writers are participating?
Dang, I want an IPhone.
Myk:
I'm willing to do the Council but I strongly suggest adding a fourth. If the council ties, it's resolved in favor of the article in question. That way any disqualifications are either 3-1 or unanimous. That should cut down on disputes.
If the council ties, it's resolved in favor of the article in question. That way any disqualifications are either 3-1 or unanimous. That should cut down on disputes.
Good point, I agree. If nobody objects, I'd accept nomination.
I love the idea of this challenge but as a practical matter, I probably won't be able to keep up with reading all of the articles for quality. So, sadly, I have to decline the nomination. I think Eric and Jack are great choices though. How about thedoctori?
Well, before we choose judges, let's give them an outline, a template if you will. You can't have folk make judgement calls when there's no framework. It shouldn't be tight as a drum, this aint the Olympics, on the other hand, format is not enough either.
wrong thread
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |